Obama has been party to trillions of dollars of "bailout money" whichis being used by the private "Fedreal" Reserve to consolidate thebanks into a world bank. Secondly carbon taxing will soon beimplemented to tax everthing from farting to breathing.
CHANGE. HOPE. PROGRESS. What do you think?
Your probably reading that title and thinking... what? Obama another Pawn. I think it's fair to say that George Dubya Bush was a "puppet" or pawn in his 8 years in office. Lets be real here the dude had no clue as to what was goin on. Im sure majority would aggree. Right? Right?? So now you have Barack at Center Stage. Don't get me wrong the dude can captivate an audience and none the less he is inspirational and the first African American president, and he's got style and a nice smile....But, it's bigger then Obama. Theres more then what meets the eye. When I first heard about Barack runnin for office for the democrats I was like that guy looks cool, yeah thats what we need, a black president! Convient i'd say. To convient. When everything is in the gutter you need something inspiring, something to get the poeple's minds off this horrible world we live in. The economy crashed, there's wars going on, people were and are suffering everywhere. You got scandals all across the map. What better way to get everybody's spirits up. Throw Obama in the mix, get the media on board and there you go. In Michael Jacksons words "Make the world a better place". I dont think that was the reason to "put" Obama in place, I see it more as a diversion from the actuality of what is actually happening. Although in our life times we may never really be able to unwrap the so called conspiricies of the western world, but we won't STOP trying to reveal the truh. If there's any hope it may just lie with in us the poeple. With that said, My man Thomas Jefferson knew what was up!!!
"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banksand corporations that will grow up around them (around the banks),will deprive the people of their property until their children willwake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered". ThomasJefferson
"We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty or profusion and servitude.If we run into such debt, as that we must be taxed in our meat and in our drink, in our necessaries and our comforts, in our labors and ouramusements, for our calling and our creeds...[we will] have no time tothink, no means of calling our miss-managers to account but be glad toobtain subsistence by hiring ourselves to rivet their chains on the necks of our fellow-sufferers... And this is the tendency of all humangovernments. A departure from principle in one instance becomes aprecedent for[ another]... till the bulk of society is reduced to bemere automatons of misery... And the fore-horse of this frightful teamis public debt. Taxation follows that, and in its train wretchednessand oppression". Thomas Jefferson
TO BE CONTINUED......
To whomever the author might be,
ReplyDelete3/4 of Americans believe that 9/11 wasn't a conspiracy; that being said, we can somewhat understand how united states elected a pawn twice in a row, and what would stop them from voting for another pawn? But that's really a ludicrous statement. When you come to see how Obama has come to power, it is hard to believe that the man is or could ever be a pawn. The man got to where he is in less than 4 years, and that's all thanks to his intellect, charm and mannerism. Furthermore, the author insinuates that "electing" a black president would distract everyone, from Americans to the rest of the world; although that is partially the case in this situation, for the whole world is impressed by how much the united states wanted change, it is also a very mis-rooted claim, because everyone who is political apt knows that governments always, and always will use international campaigns (wars) as a mean to distract its citizens and the whole world. Therefore Obama could not be a distraction, for united states is already using two distractions at the moment, ie: War in Iraq & Afghanistan. Moreover, to bring up the subject of the economy, Thomas jefferson was a genius, but a bit of a hypocrite, because he was a republican, and everyone knows that republicans stand for privatisation, just look at the united states, they were republican for 8 years, and even the most basic health care comes at a great, non-government covered cost. In any case, I can agree with the fact that letting private banks control the economy is bad, but in reality we only have ourselves to blame, for we have allowed capitalism to sink its roots so deep into our government, society, and way of life. To conclude, Obama could be seen as a contractor that has been given a house that is in the process of burning, and he is asked to fix it. I mean he knew going into the election that people would expect a lot more than any man could ever do, therefore all we can do is allow the man time to the country that Bush has left him in shambles.
I think
Regarding the whole world bank scenario. A system based on Interest will never work.There are two possible ways of drawing capital into the working machinery of the economy - to circulate capital so that it can turn the wheels of the economy and keep it going.
ReplyDeleteOne way to do this is to reward capital with profits so that you can draw capital and utilise it as you please. That means, there are two tools created in society - one is the smaller pull of capital magnates and the other much larger and diffused pull of the society as a whole. To draw money from the profits of a society and direct it to economic channels requires the banking magnates and these banking magnates work on people's greed for profit on their capital. The fundamental principle that can be understood to apply in this capitalist system, is that money gives birth to children, that is, it creates money directly. In itself it is believed to have that quality. This is a bullshit notion.
I believe we should promote share-holding - a contract where the lender of money will share in the outcome. If it results in a loss, he would suffer the loss and if it turns a profit, he will share in the profit. Now, that requires very cautious decisions on the part of the lender and a higher standard of honesty and integrity in the economy - otherwise the system cannot work. So this is a resultant benefit for the society - only those stay afloat in the market who are honest and have earned the reputation of integrity. The rest are just wiped out
Capital is created to run the wheels of the economy and nobody has the right to hoard capital. In this aspect, capital is the common property of the nation. It can be individual property only as long as it is serves some purpose. When it becomes idle, then it is to be fined. The system of taxation is exactly that fine imposed on idle capital. If the capital owned by individuals is not employed in some economic projects, it decreases in value for that individual, that is, the cost of hoarding is paid to the nation by those who hoard money. So they are compelled to push it into the economy and there, as already explained, it requires better people, more honest people, more capable and competent people to utilize that capital.
So in the end I would just like to say Obama can not fix a system that does not work in the first place